PDF version of this report
You must have Adobe Acrobat reader to view, save, or print PDF files. The
reader is available for free
download.
Human-Computer Interaction
Copyright 2022, Faulkner Information Services. All
Rights Reserved.
Docid: 00018044
Publication Date: 2211
Report Type: TUTORIAL
Preview
The study of how humans use computers — and are influenced by them —
extends far beyond technology. Human-computer interaction is a formal area
of academic study, spanning multiple disciplines, and a subject of product
development in the IT industry. This scholarly and commercial work
provides insights about long-term trends and can shed light on short-term
business decision-making.
Report Contents:
- Executive Summary
- Description
- Current View
- Outlook
- Recommendations
- References
- Web Links
- Related Reports
Executive Summary
[return to top of this
report]
Developers of hardware and software exert significant influence over how
consumers use their products. At the same time, the design choices of
developers are heavily shaped by usage habits beyond their control.
Related Faulkner Reports |
Digital Transformation Tutorial |
These two dynamics — that the design of computer technology both directs
human behavior and is subject to it — define the field of human-computer
interaction (HCI). HCI is a decades-old multidisciplinary academic field
incorporating ideas from computer science, neuroscience, sociology, art,
psychology, and other domains. It is also a major concern in business:
Hardware and software developers and cloud and social media companies
depend significantly on their ability to understand how their offerings
are used.
For companies making decisions about using technology, it is crucial to
understand the habits of particular users, whether they are employees
working with internal systems or customers interacting with, for example,
commercial e-commerce software integrated into a corporate Web site. And for
developers of technology, similar research is important to understand how
customers use their products; this research is best performed within the
narrow context of a developer’s industry because general knowledge about how
people interact with computers will be much less relevant.
Description
[return to top of this
report]
Human-computer interaction (HCI) spans a broad range of issues. At its
most technical and practical it asks questions such as, What are the
potential alternatives to mice and keyboards? On the other end of the
spectrum, HCI looks beyond technology to consider societal issues and
questions of human well-being.
The following excerpts from the “Aims & Scope” page of the scholarly
journal Human-Computer Interaction demonstrates the field’s
breadth:
“HCI seeks to foster a scientific
understanding of the cognitive and social behavior of system users and the
organizational and social impacts of that usage. Studies of usage can
cover individuals, groups, communities, organizations, and networks, as
well as societal impacts of system use.
“HCI seeks to foster rational discussion of,
and methods for, the design of computer systems and the evaluation of
existing systems. HCI is interested in a range of issues from new
user-interface techniques to the process of system design.”1
The journal also describes itself as “multidisciplinary,” a term often
used to describe HCI. Offering a similarly broad description of HCI,
artificial intelligence researcher Vijay Kanade includes”computer science,
behavioral sciences, cognitive science, ergonomics, psychology, and design
principles” in his definition.2
Kanade breaks down the discipline into the following considerations:
- “The user” — Individuals or groups are studied in terms of factors
such as their goals and abilities. - “The goal-oriented task” — Tasks such as buying a product or filling
out a form can be defined in terms of factors including their complexity
and the time needed to complete them. - “The interface” — HCI considers both hardware and software
interfaces and studies ease of use and accessibility. - “The context” — Real-world considerations, such as when and where
technology will be used, form its context. Kanade cites as examples
lighting conditions and network connections.
But Kanade’s framework is only one way to categorize the discipline. HCI
can also be broken down into the two broad perspectives from which it is
studied:
- One approach uses techniques from disciplines such as sociology to
study how humans use computers and are affected by them. Such research
is observational. - The other approach seeks to change HCI, treating the subject as a
design challenge. Potential design changes can be as commonplace as a
social media company working to increase the time visitors spend on its
site to as esoteric as creating computer programs using wooden blocks.
Current View
[return to top of this
report]
Progress and Stagnation
Researchers have studied HCI for decades. One measure of the field’s
maturity is that the scholarly journal Human-Computer Interaction
has been published since 1985. In that time, remarkable progress has been
made in many ways. For example, computers controlled directly by brains
have been developed,3 and sensors that track and monitor
patients, exchanging data with other networked systems, are used widely in
healthcare.4
On the other hand, a measure of how stagnant the field has been — in
some respects — can be seen by comparing the following excerpt
from the journal’s first issue, an article about “Affect in
Computer-Meditated Communication,” with a scholarly article published in
2021.
1985 |
2021 |
---|---|
“With the spread of computer networks, communication via computer conferences, electronic mail, and computer bulletin boards will become more common in society, but little is known about the social psychological implications of these technologies. One possibility is a change in physiological arousal, feelings, and expressive behavior — that is, affect. These computer-mediated communication technologies focus attention on the message, transmit social information poorly, and do not have a well-developed social etiquette.”5 |
A scholarly research article published in 2021 on “netiquette,” the rules and standards for interpersonal behavior online, found that despite much being written about the topic, the cyber “social etiquette” that was speculated about in 1985 “is a poorly defined line of research, both in theory and in practice.6 |
A Complex Story
HCI is not just one subject, but many. To see how the multi-threaded
nature of HCI plays out in practice, one can consider the development of
cell phones. Just as HCI is multidisciplinary, the story of cell phones
involves technology, business, and human behavior. It includes both
intentional design and the uncontrolled evolution. And it is not a single
narrative but instead many trends and events that in some cases influence
each other but that are also in many ways independent.
An example of intentionality is that in 2007, Steve Jobs introduced the
iPhone in a speech that has become legendary in the industry. The first
iPhone established the core design for today’s smartphones and enabled
mobile-dependent companies such as Uber and Doordash to launch.7
The text of Job’s speech reveals that Apple understood just how much the
iPhone (and the devices it later influenced) would change technology and
society.
Examples of natural evolution are the growth of bring-your-own-device
(BYOD) programs and the more recent pandemic-inspired increase in working
from home, which combined have blurred the distinction between business
and consumer devices. BYOD emerged gradually, in response to user habits,
and the spike in remote work was triggered by a global health crisis.
Outlook
[return to top of this
report]
The future of HCI will not follow a single narrative. The subject spans
many technical, academic, marketplace, and social issues, and it will
develop at different paces and in different ways in each niche.
Some insight into niche developments that may be on the horizon can be
gathered from studying the work on research labs. For example, the
University of Chicago’s Department of Computer Science is working on the
following relevant subjects:
- “Computing for anyone,” which forces on increasing equity in how
“computational thinking” is taught in schools. - Designing robots that interact with humans more effectively in terms
of social and group dynamics. - Researching “to make the Internet more trustworthy and inclusive,”
focusing on “usable privacy and security, ubiquitous computing, and
computing for marginalized and under-served populations.” - Building “interactive devices that integrate directly with the user’s
body,” which the researchers view as the next step beyond wearable
devices.
The perspective of the researchers leading the last project mentioned, on
“bodily-integrated” technology, provides insight into how HCI is about
much more than technology:
“We think bodily-integrated interactive devices are beneficial as they
enable new modes of reasoning with computers, going beyond just symbolic
thinking (reasoning by typing and reading language on a screen). While
this physical integration between human and computer is beneficial in many
ways (e.g., faster reaction time, realistic simulations in VR/AR, faster
skill acquisition, etc.), it also requires tackling new challenges, such
as improving the precision of muscle stimulation or the question of
agency: do we feel in control when our body is integrated with an
interface?”8
Recommendations
[return to top of this
report]
HCI raises different issues for companies that develop technology than
for those that only use it. The recommendations below are divided into
those about HCI considerations for using technology and those about HCI
considerations for developing technology.
Companies Using Technology
Some aspects of how humans use computers are common, and companies can
refer to general published research to learn foundational information
about HCI.
But organizations also have their own cultures, and their employees
don’t exactly mirror the demographics of subjects in scholarly research
studies. Therefore, to supplement findings from generic research,
organizations can also study and survey their employees to ascertain how
they use computers and what their preferences are. And even companies that
don’t develop technology often use commercial software to deliver services
to customers, such as to provide an online ordering system.
Factors to research include:
- Employee habits
- Customer habits
- Policy setting
- Purchasing decisions
- Security
Companies Developing Technology
Focus on Your Niche
In HCI, context matters greatly. Small differences in how, when, and
where technology is used can determine whether an interface works well.
Therefore, product developers would be best served by focusing on the
habits of their target users and learning from the products developed by
direct competitors.
Understand What You Can Control (and What You Can’t)
To a significant extent, employees and customers will use software and
devices as they see fit. While developers can dictate user behavior in
substantial ways, much lies outside their control. Developers thus need to
understand the constraints under which they are working and routinely, in
various ways, study their users.
Keep an Eye on the Cutting Edge
The story of Blackberry’s great early success and later spectacular
collapse provides a warning to product developers about HCI. The company
at first made an accurate prediction about what type of device business
users would find useful, and it designed popular products that met their
needs. But after the iPhone emerged as a competitor, Blackberry’s founder
failed to see the appeal of a multi-functional mobile computer, continuing
to believe that people instead would prefer to use a device like a
Blackberry.9
A lesson to learn from this is that the interactions between humans and
computers matters, and understanding this ever-evolving relationship
challenges even experts.
References
[return to top of this
report]
- 1 “Aims & Scope of HCI” Human-Computer Interaction.
- 2 Vijay Kanade. “What Is HCI (Human-Computer Interaction)?
Meaning, Importance, Examples, and Goals.” Spiceworks. July
22, 2022. - 3 Tom Cassauwers. “Brain-Controlled Computers Are Becoming
a Reality, but Major Hurdles Remain.” Horizon. December 2,
2020. - 4 Kenton O’Hara, Abigail Sellen, and Juan Wachs.
“Introduction to Special Issue on Body Tracking and Healthcare.” Human-Computer
Interaction. Volume 31. 2016. - 5 Sara Kiesler, David Zubrow, Anne Marie Moses, and Valerie
Geller “Affect in Computer-Meditated Communication: An Experiment in
Synchronous Terminal-to-Terminal Discussion.” Human-Computer
Interaction. Volume 1. 1985. - 6 Rebeca Soler-Costa, Pablo Lafarga-Ostáriz, Marta
Mauri-Medrano, and Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero. “Netiquette: Ethic,
Education, and Behavior on Internet—A Systematic Literature Review.” International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. - 7 Patrick Holland. “The iPhone at 15: Steve Jobs Revealed
His Greatest Product in 2007.” CNET. June 29, 2022. - 8 Human Computer Integration Lab Website. https://lab.plopes.org/.
Retrieved November 2022. - 9 Alexandra Appolonia, Katie Nixdorf, and Robert Leslie.
“How BlackBerry Went from Controlling the Smartphone Market to a Phone
of the Past.” Business Insider. January 14, 2022.
Web Links
[return to top of this
report]
- University of Chicago — Human-Computer Interaction: https://cs.uchicago.edu/research/human-computer-interaction/
About the Author
[return to top of this
report]
Geoff Keston is the author of more than 250
articles that help organizations find opportunities in business trends and
technology. He also works directly with clients to develop communications
strategies that improve processes and customer relationships. Mr. Keston
has worked as a project manager for a major technology consulting and
services company and is a Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer and a
Certified Novell Administrator.
[return to top of this
report]